1. The Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 92,091,028 and KRW 26,415,208 among them, 17% per annum from February 21, 2015 to the date of full payment.

1. If the purport of the entire argument is added to the evidence Nos. 1 through 9 (including virtual numbers) of recognition and judgment, the Defendant entered into a credit card use, card loan agreement, and the credit loan agreement with a financial institution on February 20, 2015 and the remaining balance and attempted interest remain, and the Plaintiff acquired each of the above claims against the Defendant as a juristic person established under the Asset-Backed Securitization Act.

According to the credit card theory 4,82,290 17,812,290 17,812,90 24,225,193 2 LG card loan theory 4,820,820,436 12,761,768 17,581,834,072 14,505,379 21,640,451 4, 279 21,647,560 10,469, 517,545 28, 2086, 205, 208, 2016, 205, 206, 208, 205, 2516, 205, 206, 258, 2016, 256, 2015, 206, 2016, 2566, 2015, 2568

In this regard, the defendant is expected to resolve the above money by the person who invested and operated the money, but the contact is not contact and the person himself/herself is not able to pay the money, and such circumstance does not constitute a ground for preventing the plaintiff's claim. Therefore, the above argument is without merit.

2. The plaintiff's claim is accepted on the ground of its reasoning.