1. The Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 79,436,405 and KRW 23,729,319 among them, 17% per annum from April 1, 2015 to the date of full payment.

1. In full view of the facts of recognition and the overall purport of each of the statements and arguments set forth in Gap evidence Nos. 3 through 6 (including virtual numbers), the defendant entered into a credit card use, card loan agreement, and the credit loan agreement with a financial institution as indicated below and the balance and attempted interest (as of March 31, 2015) remain. The plaintiff is recognized as a corporation established under the Asset-Backed Securitization Act, which transferred the above claims against the defendant.

According to the credit card 10,985,194 24,192,707,177,907,901 2KMCO (LG card) credit card 2,896,275,653,607 11,549,8823 KAMCO (LG card) credit card 1,930,850,8504,253,6363,183,1634, 163, 163, 197, 257, 305, 97, 47, 97, 964, 97, 97, 205, 205, 365, 47, 965, 97, 165, 97, 165, 205, 205, 305, 306, 47, 1964, 165

Although the defendant defense that the above claim had expired by the prescription period, according to the evidence No. 6, it is recognized that the Korea Asset Management Corporation filed a lawsuit seeking payment of the acquisition amount by Ansan Branch of Suwon District Court No. 2005da6310 prior to the expiration of the prescription period and received a favorable judgment on June 17, 2005, which was suspended by the statute of limitations.

Therefore, the defendant's defense is without merit.

2. The plaintiff's claim for the conclusion is justified and it is so decided as per Disposition.