logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원안동지원 2016.08.24 2016가단20275
양수금
Text

1. The Defendants: to the extent of the property inherited from the networkF, each of the KRW 6,650,960 to the Plaintiff and each of the KRW 4.

Reasons

1. The following facts are acknowledged in full view of the contents of evidence Nos. 1 to 9, as well as the purport of the entire pleadings.

A. The Plaintiff acquired the loan principal and interest of F from a limited liability company, etc. specialized in desired baby-backed securitization, and notified F of the fact of transferring the loan to F. As of September 29, 2015, the remainder of the loan and interest of F is KRW 33,254,800 (=the principal and interest of loan + KRW 24,79,247 + interest + KRW 8,455,53) as follows.

The sum of the balance of loans (transfer) extended to the original creditor institution of the loan section 30,365,47,365,368,365,368,478,46,47,468,368,47,468,47,47,365,368,47,45,47,365,368,468,475,47,468,47,365,368,47,468,47,47,47,47,45,368,47,47,365,47,48,47,47,47,45,47,47,47,47,47,758,47,47,197,47,197,47,167,17,1963,47,2,57,2,197,2,2,4,2,2,37,

B. Meanwhile, on the other hand, on November 12, 2007, F died of the Defendants, who were heirs, who were siblings, and the Defendants were subject to the adjudication on qualified acceptance with respect to the deceased F on April 6, 2016, the Daegu Family Court’s Ansan-dong Branch No. 2016Ra87.

2. According to the above facts of determination, the Defendants are obligated to pay damages for delay calculated at the rate of 15% per annum as stipulated in the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings from April 14, 2016 to the date of full payment, as claimed by the Plaintiff, to the Plaintiff, the assignee of the claims, respectively, within the scope of the inherited property inherited from the networkF, according to their respective inheritance shares (one-five shares each), and 4,959,849,849 (=24,79,247 won/5) among them, according to the Plaintiff’s claim.

3. The conclusion is that the plaintiff's defendants.

arrow