The prosecution against the defendant is dismissed.

1. On November 11, 2012, the Defendant: (a) around 06:00 on the charge, on the ground that the Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government’s Seongdong-gu’s corridor D (38 years of age) operated a hofe house and drinks together with his son’s hand while running a hof house; and (b) taken the victim’s face into consideration with her hand, and took the victim’s face and head at several times of drinking and drinking.

As a result, the defendant was unable to know the number of days of treatment to the victim.

2. According to the reasoning of the judgment, according to the witness D’s legal statement, the fact that the defendant assaulted the victim in such a manner that the victim’s face exceeds the victim’s face at the above time and place is recognized.

However, the defendant's face and head were examined as to whether the victim's treatment days were unknown, and the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly examined by this court are as follows: (i) although the victim was found to have a hole above the victim at the time of this case, the victim was found to have been aware of the victim's cell phone at court, and the victim was able to look at the defendant's head first after he was flick, and the head was flicked. At the time of the police investigation, the victim was faced with the victim's cell phone at court, and the victim was flick, and the head was flicked. At the time of the police investigation, "the defendant did not statement that "the defendant was flicked with drinking and flick face," and the victim was flicked with the victim's hand in order to let the flick and flicked with the victim's hand, and the victim was flick at the court floor and reported the possibility that the victim was flicked with the victim's.

The victims shall be the full number of victims.