logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2013.06.21 2013고정1124
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

Defendant

B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

Defendant

B If the above fine is not paid, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

A from October 1, 2012, around 20, with the trade name of "E" in Gangnam-gu Seoul, around 20 square meters, A was equipped with three studio rooms, one employee waiting room, Kacter, and a kitchen, and operated a commercial sex business establishment by employing Defendant B as the head of the weekly office and employing Defendant B as a commercial sex trade woman, and managing the said A's business establishment by being employed as the head of the weekly office in receipt of KRW 60,00 per day from the above A and being employed as the head of the weekly office and managing the said A's non-employed business establishment in the absence of the head of the weekly office.

Defendant

B, around 16:50 on October 15, 2012, in collusion with A, performed acts of arranging sexual traffic, etc. for the business from October 1, 2012 to October 15, 2012, by having a customer G who found his place receive 35,00 won or more for sexual traffic and let the F of sexual traffic (25 years of age) do the act of similarity in a way that helps the sexual organ of the above G be scambly scam and promptly scam the sexual organ of the above G, and making him do the act of arranging sexual traffic, etc.

Defendant

B conspired with A to engage in the act of arranging sexual traffic in the above manner.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each statement of the police suspect interrogation protocol concerning G and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to entries in the records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc. concerning facts constituting an offense, and Article 30 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Parts of acquittal under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (Defendant A);

1. The Defendant, in collusion with B on October 15, 2012, instructed a customer G to receive KRW 35,000 from the customer G who found the place of “E” located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government “E” at around 16:50 on October 15, 2012, and instruct the sexual traffic female F (n, 25 years of age) to conduct the similarity by making the said G’s sexual organ scam ske and scam as soon as possible.

arrow