All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the punishment (the fine of KRW 1,00,000, the fine of KRW 500,000, the fine of KRW 1,500, the fine of KRW 1,500,000, the fine of KRW 1,500) declared by the court below against the Defendants is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment follows: Defendant A and B worked as an employee who is not the owner of the business; Defendant B is deemed to be the first offender; Defendant A, despite the fact that he had the past history of punishment, was found to be the first offender; Defendant C had the establishment and operation of the last place of the instant case as the owner of the business; Defendant C had already established and operated the last place of the instant last place of the business; the lower court appears to have determined the punishment in consideration of the Defendants’ claims; and the lower court did not appear to have determined the punishment of the Defendants in particular in light of equity with the cases punished for the same crime; and the sentencing of the Defendants is not deemed unfair; and in full view of other various sentencing conditions stipulated in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the Defendants’ age, character, character, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, the circumstances before and after the crime, etc., the sentencing of the lower court shall

3. In conclusion, since the defendants' appeal of this case is without merit, all of the appeals are dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.

(E) In the judgment of the court below, since it is obvious that "E" is a clerical error in "G", the judgment of the court below is corrected.