All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

The summary of the grounds for appeal by the Defendants (one year and two months of imprisonment, 3.2 million won additional collection for Defendant A, and 19.7 million won additional collection for Defendant B) is too unreasonable.

Judgment

In the case of Defendant A, both the family and adoptive parent wishing to take the Defendant first, and Defendant B did not have any previous violation, the most favorable circumstance for the Defendants is that they did not have any previous violation.

However, in light of various circumstances, including the Defendants’ age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, Defendant A’s punishment was imposed on the Defendants, and the amount or frequency of the crime committed by the Defendants in relation to the crime of this case, including the following: (a) the Defendants’ age, character and behavior, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime; and (b) the number of offenses handled by the Defendants in relation to the crime of this case is not limited to a simple medication; and (c) the Defendants’ above punishment against the Defendants is heavy.

In conclusion, the defendants' appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since all of the appeals by the defendants are without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.