The judgment below

Part concerning Defendant A and B shall be reversed.

Defendant

A and B shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

(b).

1. The sentence (Defendant A and B: 8 months of imprisonment) pronounced by the lower court against the Defendants on the gist of the grounds of appeal is too unreasonable.

2. The crime of this case was committed by the defendants in collusion with the game of this case by allowing the users to suffer economic loss by continuously using the speculative spirit of customers by exchanging tangible and intangible results acquired through the use of the game of this case. The defendants' crime of this case was committed by the defendants, such as encouraging speculation and hindering sound labor awareness, and thus requires strict punishment. The period of business operation is not less than 4 months; the defendant Gap is equipped with a license for access monitoring at the entrance of the game of this case and equipment to avoid regulation by installing the CCTV. The defendant Gap was involved in the game of this case as the owner of the game of this case's game of this case's game of this case's game of this case's game of this case's game of this case's game of this case's game of this case's game of this case's game of this case's game of this case's game of this case's game of this case's case's game of this case's game of this case's case's game of this case's case's game of this case'. The defendant Eul did not directly operate the game of this case's game of this case's game of this case's game of this case's case's of this case'

However, the defendants recognized the crime of this case and are against the defendants' wrongness through the life of custody for about two months, the defendants had no record of punishment for the same kind of crime, the payment of the surcharge imposed by the court below in the case of the defendants B, the family members to support the defendants, and the social relationship of the defendants is clear.