Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, who is in a de facto marital relationship with B, conspired to use the house leased under the name of the former husband of the Defendant, as if the Defendant was leased by the Defendant, by forging and using the real estate lease contract, to use 15 million won from the victim C.

1. On November 24, 201, the Defendant, along with B, entered “F” and “G” in the resident registration number column of “F” and “F” in the name column of the lessor’s address, and affixed a new G seal at his own discretion subsequent to the name, on the column of indicating the real estate in the site for the real estate lease contract, in the color-type 401, in the gold-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, Geumcheon-gu 401, the gold-gu 401, the iron-rein concrete tank, the column of the deposit for the lease of real estate,” and on the column of the lessor’s address.

Accordingly, the Defendant, in collusion with B, forged one Chapter of the Real Estate Lease Contract in the name of the said G without authority.

2. On November 25, 201, the Defendant, in collusion with B, exercised the aforementioned investigation document by delivering a copy of the forged real estate lease agreement to C who was unaware of the forgery at the “I” restaurant located in H in the Young-gu Busan Metropolitan City, Young-gu, Busan Metropolitan City.

3. On November 25, 201, the Defendant, along with B, delivered a copy of the instant real estate lease agreement to the victim C at the “I” restaurant located in the Young-gu Busan Metropolitan City, Young-gu, Busan, to the victim C on November 25, 201, the Defendant is obliged to repay the loan by January 20, 201, if he/she lends KRW 15 million to the victim C.

If the principal is not repaid, it was false that it will be repaid even with the lease deposit of the house in question.

However, as seen earlier, the above real estate lease agreement was forged and the Defendant did not have the right to receive or dispose of the leased deposit. At the time, the Defendant and B did not have any particular property, while at the time, they were liable to pay an amount equivalent to KRW 50 million, and the Defendant’s income equivalent to KRW 2 million every month is cost of livelihood.