logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2015.05.22 2015고단698
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, who came to know through Internet search, forged a certificate of employment, etc. and purchased a vehicle from the victim Aju Capital Co., Ltd. with a view to purchasing the vehicle and offering the vehicle as collateral.

1. Forgery of private documents;

A. On October 2013, 2013, the Defendant of a certificate of employment, in collusion with loan slabs, voluntarily prepared a certificate of employment stating “name A, department management department, position employee, and working period from February 25, 2013 to October 25, 2013,” and forged a copy of a certificate of employment in the name of C, a private document concerning a certificate of employment, by arbitrarily affixing the seal of the name of D on October 25, 2013.

B. The Defendant forged the statement of the details of the deposit and withdrawal transactions in collusion with the lending hub, without authority, drafted at the above date, place, “Account Number E, the inquiry period from August 5, 2013 to October 25, 2013; deposit of KRW 2,400,00 on August 5, 2013; deposit of KRW 2,40,000 on September 5, 2013; deposit of KRW 2,40,000 on October 7, 2013; deposit of KRW 2,40,000 on deposit; and the date of transmission; and forged the statement of the details of the deposit and withdrawal transactions in the name of the Korean National Bank under the name of the Korean National Bank, a private document related to a certificate of fact.”

2. Uttering a falsified investigation document;

A. On October 25, 2013, the Defendant holding a certificate of employment in collusion with a loan bromoer, and on October 25, 2013, by facsimile around 11:00, the Defendant was an employee F of the victim who is not aware of the forgery.

The certificate of service, as described in the paragraph, was submitted by means of transmitting the certificate of service as if it were a duly formed document, and exercised it.

B. The Defendant in collusion with the lender F, who is aware of the forgery through facsimile at the time of the preceding paragraph, in collusion with the lender F, who is an employee of the victim 1-B.

The details of false entry and withdrawal transactions, such as the entry in the port, shall be as follows.

arrow