The judgment of the court below is reversed.

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

The above fine shall not be paid by the defendant.

1. The Defendant, without obtaining permission for the alteration of the current state of cultural heritage, started the construction work of the chip site of this case without obtaining permission for the alteration of the current state of cultural heritage, and even after receiving an order to suspend construction, he/she erred in executing concrete building works

However, the fact that the defendant's mistake is recognized by the original competent authority and the defendant is against the defendant, and all the certified architect and public officials in charge who were requested by the defendant at the time of the above construction permit was unaware that the designated cultural heritage was located in the vicinity of the construction site (the Do-designated cultural heritage is difficult to easily understand the existence of the designated cultural heritage because it is not indicated in the land use planning certificate). The public official in charge knew that there is a civil petition by neighboring residents and the existence of cultural heritage should be known, and then the public official in charge was ordered to suspend construction. In order to prevent the corrosion of the hardware installed by the basic construction work, the defendant was demoted with concrete building to prevent the corrosion of the hardware installed by the basic construction work. Ultimately, as the permission for the alteration of the current state of cultural heritage was rejected, the construction of the entire state of cultural heritage again by the defendant with the permission for the alteration of the current state of cultural heritage in neighboring land and suffered considerable property damage in the process, the defendant did not have any history of punishment or suspension of qualifications for the same kind of crime, the defendant's age and circumstances after the crime.

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court below is reversed and the pleading is made in accordance with Article 364(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.