logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 거창지원 2021.02.03 2020고정4
문화재보호법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

To the extent that it does not infringe the defendant's right of defense, part of the facts charged was revised.

The defendant is a person who resides in a house in Gyeongnam, and is a historic and cultural environment preservation area located within 100 meters from Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do.

A person who intends to install or expand a building or facility that is likely to impair the landscape of a State-designated cultural heritage or City/Do-designated cultural heritage in an area for the preservation of a historic and cultural environment shall obtain permission from the Commissioner of the Cultural Heritage Administration or the Mayor

From February 2014 to May 2014, the Defendant without obtaining permission for the alteration of the current state of cultural heritage of the Gyeongnam-do branch, which is the competent authority, in the Gyeongnam-gun, from around 2014, and around February 25, 2014, and the Defendant obtained permission for the alteration of the present state of cultural heritage of 59.9 square meters in the building area on the above land, 1st floor, 6.8 meters in height, and 6.4 meters in landscaped concrete roof construction. However, Article 35(1)2 and Article 74(2) of the former Cultural Heritage Protection Act (amended by Act No. 13249, Mar. 27, 2015) (amended by Presidential Decree No. 13249, Apr. 1, 2014). Thus, the Defendant did not change the existing state of cultural heritage of Do and did not have any influence on the preservation of the cultural heritage of Do (amended by Ordinance No. 2010, Jul. 29, 2014). Do).

A building area is 65.2 square meters, total floor area is 9.01 square meters, height is 5.7 meters, and number of floors is 2 stories detached houses.

Accordingly, the defendant does not obtain permission for the alteration of cultural properties from the competent authorities.

arrow