Defendant

A Imprisonment for six months, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

However, as to Defendant A, this shall not apply.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A From January 2018, a person operating a sexual traffic business establishment under the trade name of “D” by leasing the 2 and 3th floor of net Maurher City from January 2018, and Defendant B is a person managing the said “D” as Defendant A and his/her annual personnel.

On September 21, 2018, the Defendants employed a female E at the immediately preceding business establishment, received KRW 1.80,000 from the police officer who controlled the police officer who pretended to be customers in cash as the price for sexual traffic, and provided the said police officer with guidance to the place of sexual traffic of the third floor where E is located, and provided the said police officer with guidance for sexual traffic. From January 2018 to September 3, 2018, the Defendants employed a female under the name of the purchase female E, etc. and provided an unspecified customer who found the said business with employment of a female under the name of the purchase female E, etc., to receive the price for sexual traffic at KRW 1.80,00 (credit card 200,000) once.

As a result, Defendants conspired to arrange sexual traffic for business purposes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. E statements;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Application of field photographs and books and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc., Article 30 of the Criminal Act, Defendant B who choose to imprisonment: Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Article 30 of the Criminal Act, Article 30 of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines;

1. Defendant B of detention in a workhouse: Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A: Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A of a community service order: Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A: Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Act, Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic;

1. Defendant B: The act of arranging sexual traffic for the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is likely to impair good customs by commercializing sex, and there is a little social harm. The Defendants’ act of arranging sexual traffic for business purposes is heavy.

However, the defendants led to the crime of this case.