The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. At the time of the mistake of facts, the Defendant was unilaterally assaulted by the victim at the time of the mistake of facts, and there was no fact that the victim was drinking.

B. The sentence imposed by the lower court on the grounds of unreasonable sentencing (two million won of fine) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below as to the assertion of mistake of facts: (i) At the time of the police station, D, the victim, had a dispute between the defendant and the money issue at the time, and the defendant had first taken the bridge at the time of the victim's face and stated the victim's face in detail; (ii) At the time of the investigation agency since the investigation agency and the court below, E, who had observed the scene at the time, stated the victim's face at the time, with the victim's face; and (iii) at the time of the investigation agency and the court below until the court of the court below, it was hard to find the victim's face with the victim's face at the time of the interview with the victim's face at the time of the police station, and it was relatively consistent with the victim's face at the time of facing the victim's face; and (iii) the victim had sufficiently visited the victim's face at the time of the victim's face at the time of this case's injury to the police station.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion of mistake is without merit.

B. The defendant's judgment on the assertion of unfair sentencing is a monetary issue with the victim, and is contingent on the crime of this case.