The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The Defendant did not harm the victims by mistake of facts or misapprehension of legal principles as stated in the facts charged in the instant case.

In other words, the victim C had a physical contact in the process of getting up and getting up the defendant first, and ② was the victim C in order to explain the contents of the case before the preliminary dispute.

In the process of approaching the defendant by attempting to the effect that the victim C only stops, and it does not see the victim's head. <3> In the process of approaching the defendant, the defendant's math is approaching the victim's head.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below which found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case is erroneous by misapprehending the legal principles or affecting the conclusion of judgment.

B. The sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (two million won of fine) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The judgment of the court below as to the assertion of mistake of facts or misapprehension of legal principles is acknowledged based on the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below. ① The victim C made a concrete statement that “The defendant, who was not good, found his body in front of the inner border point operated by him, and her at home. The defendant was faced with his face, and the victim G, who was an employee, made his face known to the defendant.” ② The victim G made a statement that he would have face from the defendant during the process of speaking the defendant; ② The victim G stated that he was aware of the victim’s face; ③ The CCTV video installed at the entrance of the above inner border point, which the defendant would have a horse dispute with the victim; ② the defendant her body was kneeped; the victim’s knish balke, knishing the victim’s body; the victim’s body was knished; and the victim’s head was knished and knished, and the victim’s head was 51:51:25 k :51.