beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment for one year, Defendant B, and C shall be punished by a fine of 5,000,000 won.
Defendant
B and C shall each be subject to the above fine.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A is the actual business owner (H in case of the nominal owner) in charge of the overall business of the game site and exchange activities in the "G located on the second floor of the building of the Hongcheon-gun F. F. The defendant B is an employee who takes charge of the affairs of exchange (i.e., exchange) in cash by obtaining a deposit card in which the money was entered from the customers requesting the exchange in the above game site and by obtaining the deposit card in which the money was exchanged in cash from the customers requesting the exchange in the above game site. The defendant C is an employee who takes charge of the affairs of exchange in cash (i.e., exchange) of the accumulated card brought by the defendant B in the above game site.
No one shall arrange for exchange or exchange or re-purchase of intangible results obtained through the use of game water.
Nevertheless, from the beginning of April 2017 to September 21, 2017, the Defendants established 70 game machine and 30 game machine for “alley 2” in the above game room, and offered them to the general public for use by the unspecified number of customers who visited the above game room. In the event customers acquired 20,000 points or more through the use of the above game machine, the Defendants introduced that they exchange 1 won per unit in cash or sell for value the game machine with each other.
As a result, the Defendants conspired to exchange intangible results obtained through the use of game water for business purposes, or arrange exchange.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant A’s legal statement
1. Defendant B and C’s respective legal statements [the above Defendants B and C are employees who receive benefits subordinate to them, and therefore they are their aiding and abetting offenders. However, as long as they directly exchanged the above Defendants and participated in each of the instant crimes, the commission of crimes through functional control and co-processing can be sufficiently recognized (the above Defendants are deemed to be the above Defendants).