logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2019. 01. 18. 선고 2018누60870 판결
1세대 1주택 해당여부[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Suwon District Court-2018-Gu Group-6083 (Law No. 18, 2018)

Title

One house for one household;

Summary

From the date of destruction of the previous house in this case, the Plaintiff’s possession period is less than three years after forming one independent household, and thus, it is not eligible for non-taxation for one household.

Related statutes

Article 154 (1) of the Enforcement Decree of the Income Tax Act

Cases

2018Nu60870

Plaintiff and appellant

KimA

Defendant, Appellant

BB Director of the Tax Office

Judgment of the first instance court

Suwon District Court Decision 2018Gudan6083 Decided July 18, 2018

Conclusion of Pleadings

November 23, 2018

Imposition of Judgment

January 18, 2019

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the first instance shall be revoked. The transfer income tax reverted to the Plaintiff in April 1, 2017 by the Defendant against the Plaintiff on April 1, 2017

176,326,090 won (including additional taxes) shall be revoked.

Reasons

1. Quotation of the reasons for the judgment of the first instance;

The reason for this judgment is that "the apartment of this case" in the 8th judgment of the court of first instance is "the previous apartment of this case".

Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act, civil litigation, and civil litigation.

It shall be quoted in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Forwarding Act.

2. Conclusion

If so, the plaintiff's claim shall be dismissed as it is without merit. The judgment of the court of first instance shall be with the same conclusion.

Since the plaintiff's appeal is legitimate, it is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow