1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 61,248,779; and (b) KRW 3,000,000 to Plaintiff A; and (c) each of them, from November 6, 2013 to June 6, 2016.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is an insurer who is an insurance business entity under the Insurance Business Act and has concluded a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with Nonparty C on a non-party D automobile.

B. On November 6, 2013, Nonparty E driving the above vehicle on the Cheongcheon-gun, Cheongcheon-do, and driving on the Cheongcheon-do, Cheongcheon-gu, Cheongcheon-do, in the direction of Taecheon-gu, Cheongcheon-do (hereinafter “instant accident”). On the left side of the road, Nonparty E went away from the road to the driver’s care in the direction of Taecheon-do, and the Plaintiff A, who was on board the said vehicle at the time, suffered injury, such as brain, salkin, and salkin, etc., due to the instant accident.

C. The plaintiff B is the husband of the plaintiff A.

[Reasons for Recognition] Each entry of Gap evidence 1, 2, 3, and 8 (if there are virtual numbers, including branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply)

2. The assertion and the judgment Plaintiffs seek for the payment of damages for lost income of Plaintiff A incurred due to the instant accident, medical expenses already paid, and damages for future treatment expenses, consolation money, etc., and the Defendant, as the Plaintiff died in the said vehicle, limitation of liability should be made. The Plaintiff failed to promote safe driving of the said vehicle, and the Plaintiff did not wear the safety bell, and thus, comparative negligence should be set off.

According to the treatment process of light salt bars, etc. through long-term hospitalization and pains, which are recognized in accordance with the evidence Nos. 3 and 8, and the appraisal results of this case, the plaintiff may recognize the occurrence of an escape certificate of upcoming signboards by the accident of this case, and the fact that the plaintiff suffered an injury, such as an injury on the inner part, the inner part, and the heat.

Therefore, the defendant has a duty to compensate the plaintiffs for the damages caused thereby.

B. The Plaintiff A’s property loss incurred due to the Plaintiff’s loss of lost income (A) the Plaintiff’s statement of Nos. 1 and 2, including the gender, age, and life expectancy of the Plaintiff A, and the party members.