The defendant's KRW 17,620,431 to Plaintiff A and its related KRW 5% per annum from September 21, 2014 to July 14, 2017, and the following.

On September 21, 2014, the establishment of the liability for damages was recognized, Plaintiff A was driving in the vicinity of G cafeteria in the direction of Kim Jong-si in the direction of Kim Jong-si (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant A”), and the vehicle of SM3 (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant”) driven by H was driving in the same lane of the opposite side of the road (section 2).

On the same day, at around 15:54, the driver of the defendant vehicle tried to change the vehicle from two lanes to one lane without properly verifying the running of the motor vehicle on the left side, and the driver returned to two lanes, due to its influence, the salary class truck, which was in progress on the first lane, lost its center while driving the motor vehicle, was dissatisfyed beyond the center line, and became in conflict with the plaintiff vehicle on the opposite line.

(A) The above accident is the spouse of the Plaintiff A, and the Plaintiff C and D are the children of the Plaintiff (Evidence A No. 4), and the Defendant is the insurer who entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to the Defendant’s vehicle.

According to the above facts of recognition of liability, the defendant is liable for damages suffered by the plaintiff A due to the accident of this case as the insurer of the defendant vehicle.

However, considering the degree of injury suffered by the plaintiffs A, it is difficult to recognize that the above plaintiffs suffered mental pain as much as the plaintiffs recognize a separate consolation money to the other plaintiffs, and thus, the above plaintiffs' claims are not accepted.

In addition to the matters stated separately below the scope of liability for damages, it shall be as specified in the attached Table for Calculation of Damages (including the supplementary devices).

The current price calculation at the time of the accident shall be based on the discount method that deducts interim interest calculated at the rate of 5/12 per month.

The plaintiff A asserts that at the time of the accident in this case, the plaintiff A was engaged in the wholesale business for agricultural use under the name of I.

However, the accident of this case by the plaintiff A.