1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 3,00,000 for each of the KRW 136,326,863, Plaintiff B, and C and each of them from August 10, 2013 to Plaintiff A.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. Grounds for liability

(1) On August 9, 2013, the Defendant, along with the Plaintiff, etc., who is a woman-friendly E and her three-year relationship, had drinking alcohol at Gcell parking lot located in Kimcheon-si F on August 9, 2013.

However, under the influence of alcohol, Plaintiff A abused the Defendant’s face at a hand and drinking times, flapsing bat with flaps, flapsing bats, flapsing the flapsing into the floor, and flapsing the flapsing, etc., the Defendant asserted this against the Defendant when flapsing the Plaintiff A’s bridge into the floor and flapsing out of the floor, and then the Defendant flapsing out of the parking lot and returned to the parking lot at around 02:15. When she again heards the Plaintiff’s face, the Defendant inflicted an injury, such as the flapsing of the flapsing of the flaps and the inner wall when flapsing the Plaintiff’s face into drinking.

D. The plaintiff B and C are the parents of the plaintiff A.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3, 5, 6, 18, Eul evidence Nos. 2 and 3 and the purport of the whole pleadings

B. According to the above facts, the defendant is liable for damages suffered by the plaintiffs as a tortfeasor who injured the plaintiff A.

C. Limit of liability: (a) as seen earlier, there was an error that caused the instant accident by assaulting the Defendant first while under the influence of alcohol by the Plaintiff, etc.; (b) it is reasonable to consider the negligence of the Plaintiff A in determining the amount of damages to be compensated by the Defendant, but it is reasonable to view that the negligence ratio is 40

2. Scope of liability for damages

A. On the basis of the following (i) facts of recognition and evaluation, the loss of the lost income of the Plaintiff A lost due to the instant accident, and then according to the Hofman Accounting Act, which deducts intermediary interest at the rate of 5%/12 per month as the method the Plaintiffs seek, as seen above, according to the method of the Plaintiffs’ request.