logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2019.04.11 2018누68072
식품위생법위반행정처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The grounds alleged by the plaintiff in this court while filing an appeal for the acceptance of the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the contents alleged by the plaintiff in the court of first instance. The judgment of the court of first instance dismissing the plaintiff's claim even if the evidence submitted by the court of first instance and this court

Therefore, the court's explanation on this case is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance except for partial revision as follows. Thus, this court's explanation is acceptable in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

[Revision] Part of the first instance court's judgment "luminous Map 4" shall be raised as "advertisement".

Part 5 of the judgment of the first instance court is "as above" in Part 2 of the judgment of the second instance as "as below."

2. Thus, the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow