1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

The grounds alleged by the plaintiff in the trial while filing an appeal by the court of first instance do not differ from the contents of the plaintiff's assertion in the court of first instance, and even if the evidence submitted in the court of first instance and the court of first instance are re-examineed along with the plaintiff's assertion, the judgment of the court

Therefore, the reasoning for this Court regarding this case is that the reasoning for the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that for the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following modifications, and thus, it shall be quoted in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420

[Revision] Under the third page of the judgment of the first instance court, the second "this court" shall be deemed to be the "court of the first instance and this court".

In addition, the first instance court's judgment Nos. 4 and 2 " is difficult to recognize it as such, even if the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff is considered as a whole, and there is no other evidence to recognize it."

On May 10, 2019, the final appeal was dismissed by the Supreme Court and the final judgment became final and conclusive on May 10, 2019.

The first instance court: the Seoul Administrative Court 2018Gudan67230 case, the appellate court: the Seoul High Court 2018Nu70303 case, the Supreme Court 2019Du3380 case, the Supreme Court 2019Du3380 case.

In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance court is justifiable, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.