A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, a “(State)C” manager director in Seocheon-gu, Nowon-gu, Seoul. The Defendant: (a) failed to comply with D’s request to leave several times at the parking lot of the said state; (b) forged an official document to remove the packages in the name of the Bupyeong-gu, Seocheon-gu; and (c) had the intention to exercise D’s right to use it.

1. On November 2016, the Defendant forged official document: (a) at the management office in Seocheon-gu, Nowon-gu, Seoul; (b) at the management office in Seocheon-gu, Seoul; (c) the official seal in the deputy market located in Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seoul using its own computer, carried out a document file stating “the notice of the plan to check the actual status of the use and management of facilities in the E second half of the year 2016; and (d) the title “the suspension and removal of fishery products restaurant business in C”; and (c) continue to develop your 1.

2. As a result of the inspection of the actual condition of the management of the E facilities at the lower end of 2016, illegal food sale is discovered and known to the public in an unauthorized and violated building.

3. Fishery products and liquor-sale restaurants established within the E’s sentiments are included in the site for which permission for free use has been granted pursuant to Article 7 (Payment with Contributions) of the Public Property and Commodity Management Act and Article 20 of the same Act, and the time for restoration to their original state after voluntary removal is called the time for restoration from the site for which permission for free use has been granted pursuant to Article 20 of the same Act. In the event of nonperformance within the time limit, the compulsory removal will be executed at our city.

- The phrase “as described above,” and then printed out one copy of the document stamped in the name of the vice market as above.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the defendant has forged a letter of official document in the name of the father-market, which is a public document.

2. The Defendant displayed, at the time, and place specified in paragraph 1, a forged official document to the said D as if he were issued a genuine official document.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to D or F;

1. Investigation Report (Non-Party F telephone conversations) 1.