Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 80,000.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

On December 18, 2015, at C office located in the fifth floor of the Seoul Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government B B building, the Defendant obtained from “D” bulletin board, “D”, “I am,” and “I am away from the office of “I am, I am, I am, I am, because I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am. am, I am am, I am, I am, I am, because I am, I am, I am, I am

G was acquitted by intimidation and received a notice of criminal compensation.

H Court rendered a verdict of not guilty.

A complaint dispute shall be raised, and a complaint shall be raised.

Hexaly contracted well.

“.......”

The fact was that the victim did not have stolen documents from the F attorney office.

Accordingly, the defendant abused the victim's reputation by disclosing false information through information and communications networks with a view to slandering the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of a witness I;

1. Partial statement of the witness J, E, and K in the court;

1. A protocol of partially examining the suspect of the police against the defendant (including part concerning the E-examination);

1. Statement made to K in the police statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on the screen of a camera-fabund and a report on investigation by witnesses;

1. Article 70 (2) of the Act on Promotion of Utilization of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, etc., concerning facts constituting a crime and Article 70 of the relevant Act;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Determination on the assertion by the Defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The summary of the argument is the fact that a notice of the same article as the facts stated in the criminal facts in the judgment of the defendant has been posted, but the illegality is excluded because it is for the public interest, that is, for the purpose of preventing the victims of good faith from causing many damage by deceiving victims E-Caf members as if they were true or have much legal knowledge

Therefore, the defendant should be pronounced innocent.

2. Determination

(a) is a false fact;