logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2014.02.21 2013고단4588
성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(성적목적공공장소침입)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Criminal facts

At around 21:59 on July 23, 2013, the Defendant concealed any gap in the first floor women's toilets located in the Gansi District C, in one column of the above women's toilets. The Defendant stolen that D (n, 25 years of age) having entered the above space in the above space, thereby viewing melting a change.

Accordingly, the Defendant infringed on the above female toilets with a view to meeting his sexual desire.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement to the effect that the defendant has entered the toilet as stated in the ruling at the time set in this Court;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on witness D and E's respective legal statements;

1. Article 12 of the relevant Act on Criminal Crimes and Article 12 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes elective Punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

1. Article 16 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes Committed;

1. Article 186 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act that bears litigation costs and the grounds for sentencing;

1. The Defendant asserts that, at the time of conviction, he was merely entered into a female toilet with melting urines, that there is no studio by a woman who is facing the above-mentioned partitions, and that there is no studio, and that he did not enter a female toilet for the purpose of satisfying sexual humiliations.

However, according to the contents of the statement and the attitude of the statement in the court, according to each legal statement of D and E, it is recognized that at the time the defendant had the intention to meet the sexual desire of the defendant at the time, when considering these facts, the defendant was found to have the appearance that D had the head above, and D had the head above, and it was found that D had the intention to meet the sexual desire of the defendant.

Therefore, the facts charged in this case are fully admitted, and the defendant's assertion is not accepted.

2. The crime of this case for the reason of sentencing is a theft of the female appearance that the defendant entered a female toilet, which is viewed as melting from the side partitions, and the punishment of the act itself is significant.

arrow