Text
1. The plaintiffs' claims against the defendants are all dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. 1 Status of the Parties 1) Net F (Death on May 26, 1952, hereinafter “the deceased”)
In the south of the deceased, there is net G (Death at around 200), and the Plaintiff A is the wife of the net G, and the Plaintiff B, C, and Nonparty H is the children of the network G. 2) there is a network I with the birth of the deceased, and there is a net J (Death on August 5, 2017), Defendant D is the wife of the network J, and Defendant E and Nonparty K are the children of the network J.
B. As to the land of Pyeongtaek-si, which was owned by the deceased (hereinafter “the instant land”), the registration of ownership transfer was completed on September 17, 1982 under the deceased’s name, the south of the deceased on May 26, 1952.
C. On October 27, 2016, the transfer registration of ownership in the name of Plaintiff B was completed on October 27, 2016 on the ground of the gift made from October 26, 2016 with respect to forest land of Pyeongtaek-si M 11,655 square meters, which was owned by the deceased J.
K waived waived inheritance of the net J's property rights and obligations.
Accordingly, the inheritance ratio of Defendant D is 3/5, and the inheritance ratio of Defendant E is 2/5.
【In the absence of dispute over the grounds for recognition, the entries of Gap evidence 1 through 4, the fact-finding with respect to the head of the Suwon District Court, and the purport of the whole pleadings
2. The deceased J occupied and cultivated the instant land owned by the deceased as the deceased I’s children.
The deceased G, who was aware of the ownership of the instant land inherited after the deceased’s death, purchased the instant land from the deceased J in the amount of KRW 150 million, and completed the registration of ownership transfer on September 17, 1982.
In around 2016, the Plaintiffs, the heir of the deceased G, discovered a sale certificate (No. A. 1) that the instant land was owned by the Deceased, and demanded the deceasedJ, who was still alive at the time, to compensate for the entire market price of the instant land.
Accordingly, on October 26, 2016, the deceased J cannot pay the entire market price of the instant land to the Plaintiff, and preferentially pays the Plaintiff KRW 11,655 square meters of Pyeongtaek-si, which is its own possession, to the Plaintiff B as a substitute.