1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. On March 7, 2017, the plaintiff alleged as the cause of the claim in this case. The non-party E and F (the deceased's children are the deceased's children, the deceased's children are the deceased's children) 1/8 shares each, and the plaintiffs and the defendant jointly inherited the deceased's 1/4 shares each. On October 1, 2015, the deceased sold Nos. 124,500,000 to a third party for the purchase price of KRW 124,50,000, which was owned by the deceased and used at the hospital of the deceased, KRW 105,000, KRW 00, KRW 00, KRW 1000, KRW 00, KRW 000, KRW 400, KRW 100, KRW 000, KRW 300, KRW 400, KRW 600, KRW 300, and the defendant's promise to return the deceased's debts to the defendant.

2. Determination on the cause of the claim

A. According to Gap evidence No. 6 (Recording) as to the part of the claim for the return of deposit deposit, the defendant's above 105,000,000 won is acknowledged, but there is no content suggesting that any agreement has been reached between the plaintiffs' side and the defendant as to the issue of who takes the initiative in the future and the issue of distribution of the above 105,00,000 won, since there is a conflict between the plaintiffs' side and the defendant, and there is no content suggesting that any agreement has been reached between them. The evidence No. 7 (Certificate) merely stated in the J's written statement, which is the wife of the plaintiff B. Thus, the above evidence alone kept the deceased's above 105,00,000 won to the defendant.

or the defendant's above 105,000.