1. It is confirmed that each share listed in the separate sheet 2 of the real estate listed in the separate sheet 1 is owned by the plaintiffs.

2...

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On July 11, 1960, the deceased J established a new domicile as Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government M due to the family-friendly relationship after the divorce with L on the part of K students around July 11, 1960. The main copy of the family-friendly relationship was the owner of the family and died on November 30, 2018.

The deceased J's spouse was N and died on May 2, 2010.

There is no child of the networkJ (which is N's children, as seen in the front and rear, but is not adopted by the networkJ). According to family relation certificate, the parts of the networkJ are as O, Mono Pala (which are not stated in their specific human information), Q(R) and Mono as S.

B. The children of the Plaintiff A(IB, B(W in the Mayang-si, V-si), C (X-si, Busan Y), and D (Zin-gu, Yongsan-gu, Seoul) are deceased AB (AB and AC birth, and death on May 20, 1961).

(Other, AD (AE-si AF birth in Daegu), but already died on March 15, 1952). A copy of the network AB’s certified copy is described as “AG” (R), “AG”, and “AB” as “S” as the child of the network AB, and the network AB is described as the south of the State.

According to the resolution of the network AB, the existence of R and S 3 South is confirmed, but it was born in the flatyang on the AI date and died on July 25, 1950 without spouse or child.

Plaintiff

E, F, G, H, and I are children of the deceased AJ (AJ, the Pyeongyang of the AK Date, the death of December 24, 1997).

The parts of the network AJ's various copies are "AM (R)" (R), the mother, and the network AJ are described as their children, which have their addresses in "Y in Pyang-si" (L).

(c) At the time of the deceased J’s death, real estate listed in the annexed sheet 1 is due.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 through 16 (if there are various numbers, including branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. In full view of the above-mentioned facts and the following facts and circumstances revealed in the above-mentioned evidence, the deceased J is the same as the network AB, the network AJ, and the network AH.