1. The defendant shall be punished by a fine of 300,000 won;

2. If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who engages in his own business.

On March 23, 2013, while collecting safety materials supplied within the office No. 501 office of Daejeon U.S. B building No. 500 on March 23, 2013, Samsung 520 Empt (300,000 won at the market price) owned by the injured party Samsung 520 Emb. (30,000 won at the market price) and the outer hived one (80,000 won at the market price) were stolen.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Investigation report (specific suspect);

1. A certificate of transfer of damaged articles;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing photographs of damaged articles;

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

2. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse.

3. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted as to the assertion of the defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the defendant delivered the company where D (the director of the management division) work to the company with D (the director of the management division) with safety features equivalent to 6 million won, etc., and that the company promptly closed its door without the business registration certificate, and therefore, the company had D's lapt and the outer lap in order to identify the company's president's personal information, and brought it to the police station only in this frame, so it cannot be viewed

However, according to the defendant's legal statement and investigation report (suspect specific)'s statement, the defendant carried on March 23, 13, 200 and went to the Royn North and the Had, and five days thereafter.

3. It can be recognized that the defendant voluntarily surrenders to the police and returned it. If the defendant wants to know the personal information of the president of the D Company, then the defendant merely wanted to know the personal information of the president of the D Company.

3. The fact that it was no more reasonable to confirm it at the office of D, or to take such measures as making phone calls to D, and that it was actually made a statement to the effect that the Defendant did not open it with the Nompt and do not actually open it. The Defendant cited amblick in the caric book in the police.