beta
Text
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
Reasons
1. Summary of grounds for appeal;
A. Fact-misunderstanding (as stated in the lower judgment, the part 2015 higher part 2416 higher part of the lower judgment) is only a fact with intent to use Not North Korea, which appears to have been abandoned, and thus, there was no fact that the Defendant stolen cash from Not North Korea and wallets owned by the victim G with intent to commit larceny, as stated in the lower judgment.
Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below which found the defendant guilty of this part of the facts charged is erroneous by mistake of facts.
B. The punishment sentenced by the court below against the defendant (two years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.
2. Determination
A. The lower court acknowledged the following facts based on the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court regarding the assertion of misunderstanding of facts: (i) the victim G was unable to have a room on the gypt North Korea and the office floor of the F Living Center in Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on December 15, 2014 on the 13:00 books of the F Living Center in Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and was on the gymnasium; (ii) the victim G was on the gymnasium’s gymnasium; and (iii) around 15:00, around 15:00, the cash 400,000 in the
In light of the fact that he stated from around 13:00 to around 15:00, he appears to have entered the above office and left the Not North, etc., and ② around 16:30 of the same day, the Defendant sold the above Not North Korea to the “K” of a seller of used electronic equipment located on the second floor of Yongsan-gu Seoul Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government J., and the Defendant was able to take contact with the Defendant, and the Defendant reported the fact to the police, as alleged by the Defendant, that the person who stolen the Not North Korea owned by the victim left the Not North Korea for an excessive time, and the Defendant’s acquisition of it was very low possibility that he sold the Not North Korea to the seller of electronic equipment, and ③ the Defendant continued to answer the questions of the investigator or that the head of the Not.30.
In order to avoid the answer, etc., it is included in the shopping white bag that has been abandoned in the past as the judgment of the court below, while avoiding the answer.