A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. 상해 피고인은 2014. 5. 1. 19:50경 남양주시 B에 있는 피해자 C이 운영하는 ‘D’ 유흥주점에서 피고인이 이전에 위 주점에서 술값을 과다하게 지불한 적이 있다는 이유로 피해자에게 “네 년이 주인 여자냐, 씨팔년 장사 못하게 하겠다.”라고 욕설을 하며 손바닥으로 피해자의 뺨을 1회 때리고 주먹으로 피해자의 등과 팔을 수회 때린 후 발로 피해자의 다리를 수회 걷어찼다.

As a result, the defendant got off the victim's face-to-face care for about two weeks.

2. From the date and time indicated in paragraph (1) to 20:30, the Defendant interfered with the business of the victim’s entertainment bar business by force, by force, preventing customers from entering the said entertainment tavern by avoiding disturbance, such as having the victim take a bath as seen above in the said “D” entertainment tavern operated by the victim C, taking sound, and taking the victim’s time, etc.

3. At around 20:32 on the day specified in paragraph (1), the Defendant expressed that, as F of the police officer belonging to the Namyang-gu Police Station E-gu Seoul Police Station, who called the above site upon receiving a report of 112 at the above main station, she was able to have the Defendant returned home, and “F was able to have the young son get out of the clothes of Neass. Ba, Mads, Mads. Mads. Mads. Mads. Mads. Mads. Mads. Mads... Mads...” The Defendant continued to arrest the Defendant as a flagrant offender in the crime of assault and interference with business, she committed assault against F’s own F’s son’s buck and mads by walking the fbuck and the f’s frods.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of a police officer.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement concerning C and F;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 257 (1), Article 314 (1) and Article 136 of the Criminal Act that applies mutatis mutandis to the relevant criminal facts and the choice of punishment;