A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

On April 29, 2015, from around 01:20 to 02:00, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s main business by force by allowing the victims to leave the place and make the victims unable to engage in normal business, thereby obstructing the victim’s main business by force. The Defendant: (a) the Defendant, on the ground that the victim’s “E” operated by the victim D in Pyeongtaek-si from around 01:20 on April 29, 2015, she had a drinking alcohol to listen to the phrase “E” that she had been drinking; (b) the Domin service was not in mind; and (c) the Domin service was not in mind.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness D and F;

1. Written statements of D and F (the defendant and his defense counsel are the fact that the defendant raised the victim's speech, but they do not have any disturbance, such as taking a bath or taking the wall of the above main point into drinking. However, the following circumstances acknowledged by the aforementioned evidence are, namely, the main point of this case where the defendant paid the victim the charges, and the victim made a report to the police, and the victim made a request to show the defendant at the time of the report to the police, the disturbance of the defendant was deemed to have reached beyond the level of common sense that the victim could cope with the victim. The victim stated in this court that the defendant's voice was above the victim's wall, but the victim's sound was the same as the victim's wall was passed at the toilet, but the defendant's wall was able to stand at the time of the investigation at the police (the sound was memoryed, and the sound was recorded in the victim's sound at the time of the investigation at the time of the victim's arrival, and the sound was recorded in the statement to the effect that it was credibility.