logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2016.06.02 2015고단4678
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 2, 2014, the Defendant sold the Victim F with a full-time loss to the Victim F at the E office located in Dong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Incheon, in 2006, food A4 G car with a full-time loss to the damaged Party F.

In order to be asked, “if there is insurance money set by the insurance company when replacing any part, and the insurance money set by the insurance company wishes to be replaced with a better part, it is indicated that it is a total loss if it is replaced with a better part with the insurance money set by the insurance company.

It is called "Mali-Mali," which means "Mali-la".

However, in fact, when the cost of repair exceeds the value of a vehicle set by an insurance company due to an accident, the insurance company compensates the borrower for the value of the vehicle and recovers the vehicle and then sells it by auction or public sale. In the case of a former vehicle, it is highly likely that the accident would normally be the vehicle.

B. In addition, the Defendant did not confirm whether the repair cost exceeds the value of the vehicle, without confirming whether the repair cost was a full-time loss, on the wind that the said GAD car was replaced with a good part in the possession of the vehicle as at the end of the Defendant.

In the end, the Defendant, as above, by deceiving the victim as above, obtained the victim's money of KRW 19.5 million (including KRW 4 million with the lending price of the victim's vehicle) from the victim as the price for the said car from the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of the witness H;

1. Recording of the statement to the witness F in the second public trial records;

1. Some of the protocol concerning the examination of the suspect against the defendant;

1. Documents related to the details of the running of the clean and vehicle photographs, etc.;

1. A transcript;

1. Each CD [the following circumstances recognized by the foregoing evidence], i.e., the victim was informed the Defendant of the concept of the entire vehicle at the time of purchasing the instant vehicle.

arrow