logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2018.06.28 2018고단2442
사기
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for six months, and for one year and six months, respectively.

(2) the date of this judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 14, 2016, the Defendants were willing to succeed to the lease agreement for the vehicle of HUD 8 under the name of F and to change the leased owner by acquiring the vehicle of HUD 8 in the name of Dong F in Defendant B, while purchasing the vehicle of GUD 1 in the name of Dong F, and taking the loan for the vehicle of GUD 8 in the name of F and taking a divided account of the loan.

Defendant

A around April 14, 2016, at the J Office operated by A-5 of the second floor A-5 of the Yeonsu-gu Incheon Metropolitan City I, a financial lease agreement stating that the victim's non-victim Mable Social Services Korea Co., Ltd. will pay for HH 8 automobiles each 56 months of the monthly lease fee of KRW 2,084,458, and sent it by facsimile to the victim company, and around that time, the victim company was delivered the said car by facsimile.

However, in fact, Defendant B was liable for credit card loan loan loan of approximately KRW 30 million, and as if Defendant B was a non-accidentd vehicle, Defendant A was using approximately KRW 300 million loan to financial companies, etc. for the purpose of purchasing the vehicle with no accident, and Defendant A was in the state of having no particular revenue or property at the time. Thus, even if Defendant A was delivered with the said H car pursuant to the instant lease agreement, it was intended to receive a loan of KRW 80,000 for purchasing another GH car in the name of F, and the Defendants did not have any intent or ability to pay the rent of KRW 8,00,000,000.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to deception the victim company and received delivery from the victim company of the amount of KRW 86,438,309 of the market value of KRW 86,438,309.

2. On April 19, 2016, Defendants purchased an accident-free vehicle that caused a traffic accident on or around April 2016, but whose history of the accident is not verified due to the failure to repair the vehicle through the receipt of insurance, and applied for a loan to purchase the vehicle as if they were the accident-free vehicle, and thereafter.

arrow