logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.04.21 2020고정606
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in the duty of driving a rocketing private taxi.

On January 16, 2020, the Defendant driven the above vehicle on the 22:57th day of January 16, 2020, and turned to the U.S. speed from one lane to the U.S. 5 lanes in the direction of the afforestation distance on the erost road in Gwanak-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City.

At all times, there is a crosswalk in which a crossing-type signal is installed and a sign board to the left-hand and pedestrian signal can be displayed, so the driver of the motor vehicle has a duty of care to safely drive the motor vehicle in accordance with the traffic signal and instruction by reducing speed and keeping it well and preventing the accident in advance.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected to turn to the left on the front line of the road which is the right side of his own vehicle, and turned to the left at a two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lane road by the victim E (Nam, 23 years of age).

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as the unknown part of the elbow blue blue in need of approximately two weeks of treatment due to the occupational negligence as above, the blue, blue, and sa

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Results of the CD reproduction and viewing;

1. E statements;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on investigation reporting;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 3 (1) and proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the Selection of Punishment, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Although the matter cannot be deemed to be light in light of the quantity of the accident and the degree of accident confirmed by video in violation of the reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the order of provisional payment cannot be deemed to have been operated at a rapid speed on the electric kickboard.

The circumstances of the damage suffered by the victim are somewhat somewhat.

arrow