logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2021.01.25 2020고정2165
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a Switzerland car.

On February 20, 2020, the Defendant driven the above SP car on February 13:50, and transferred the history distance to the non-fluorous speed at night in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, by driving the sP car at night. The Defendant moved the history distance from the luminous slope to the string-down slope at school.

Since there are frequent traffic of vehicles, in such a case, the Defendant, who is engaged in driving of the vehicle, has a duty of care to prevent accidents by accurately manipulating the front door and the left and right of the vehicle, by securing the safety of course, and continuing the accident after securing the safety of course.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and stated that the corresponding part of the instant indictment is “signal” to indicate that the left turn turn turn turn turn turn turn turn turn signal, but it is apparent that it is a clerical error in the “Direction of the safety sign indicating that the left turn turn turn turn turn turn turn turn turn turn turn turn turn turn turn turn turn turn turn turn, and thus, it is recognized as criminal facts by correcting it as “Direction of the safety sign indicating that the turn turn turn turn turn turn turn turn turn turn turn turn turn turn turn turn turn.”

Pursuant to A, the victim C (WW X5) driving 34 years old, followed the right side of the victim C(SMW X5 years old) driving, was shocked with the front part of the spke car.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim C due to the above occupational negligence, such as salt and tensions that require approximately two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A actual investigation report prepared by C on the occurrence of a traffic accident;

1. Vehicle photographs;

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. CCTV video CDs;

1. On the premise that the Defendant’s driver’s car has an order of priority in passage between the Defendant’s car and the Defendant’s car operated by the victim C, not the Defendant’s car entering the normal right ofpass and the signal.

arrow