1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is that "the business-related statement (such as medical specialists in the working environment department, etc. of a hospital affiliated with a university)" is "the business-related statement (the working environment department, etc. of a university affiliated with a university)" under the 11th 4th 11th of the judgment of the court of the court of the first instance, and the addition of party members as to whether proximate causal relation exists between the business branch of the case and the plaintiff's business are the same as the reasons of the judgment of the court of the first instance, and thus, it is acceptable as it is in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The following circumstances are acknowledged in full view of Gap evidence 1-1 to 5, Gap evidence 2, 4, 5, and 6, Eul evidence 8-1 to 6, Eul evidence 9-1 to 3, the results of the examination by the court of the first instance on the medical record of the Katool Seoul Matern Hospital, and the purport of the arguments on the fact-finding for the modern car industry and the Katool Seoul Matern Hospital, i.e., the plaintiff was employed in Hyundai Motor on October 27, 2003. The plaintiff was employed in the 1979 Hyundai Motor. The plaintiff was employed in the 2nd revision of the 1979, and the 1st revision of the 2nd revision of the 1st revision of the 2nd revision of the 2nd revision of the 1st revision of the 2nd revision of the medical record, and the plaintiff was placed in the 1st revision of the 1st revision of the 1st revision of the 2nd revision of the 1st revision of the 4th amendment.