logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.06.02 2015나51479
손해배상(자)
Text

1. The part against the plaintiff corresponding to the money ordered to be paid under the judgment of the court of first instance shall be revoked.

The defendant.

Reasons

1. The court's explanation on this part of the claim for damages is the same as the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, citing it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. In addition to the matters stated below within the scope of liability for damages, each corresponding item of the Schedule of Calculation of Compensation for Damages shall be as follows, and in principle, the period for the convenience of calculation shall be calculated on a monthly basis, but less than the last month and less than KRW 1 shall be discarded.

The calculation of the current value at the time of the accident shall be based on the reduction rate of 5/12 percent per month to deduct the interim interest.

A. Personal information 1): The income and operating period of the attached table for calculating the amount of damages as indicated in the annexed table for calculating the amount of damages: 2) the urban daily wage, the number of working days, the period of operation 3) the disability and the labor ability loss rate of the Plaintiff with respect to the degree of contribution to the Plaintiff’s kinglurism to the kinglurism, Gap evidence No. 6, the result of the first instance court’s physical examination of the head of the affiliated university of Gyeonghee University, the result of the fact-finding inquiry by the head of the affiliated university of Gyeonghee University (as of September 1, 2015) and the result of the fact-finding inquiry by the head of the affiliated hospital of Gyeonghee University (as of October 26, 2008, the Plaintiff claimed for the above 9% of the total amount of damages caused by the artificial disc No. 50-1,000). On the other hand, the Plaintiff’s death and injury caused by the 9th court’s 1,015.

arrow