A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a ship of the nationality of the People's Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as "China"), and is a person who provides tourism guidance services to Chinese tourists.

Although the Defendant obtained a tourist employee qualification certificate, he had been able to arbitrarily prepare and use a tourist employee qualification certificate in order to continue to fall under the examination.

On August 2015, 2015, the Defendant sent a photograph of a tourist employee qualification certificate to D who has a tourist employee qualification certificate.

In other words, upon request, he/she received the aforementioned D’s photograph by using mobile phone Kakao Stockholm messages, and deleted the aforementioned D’s photograph from September 20, 2015, and requested a tourist employee qualification certificate by sending D’s photograph to a e-mail to a non-fluorous bromoer in China on September 2015, and requested the forgery of D’s tour employee qualification certificate by using the same size of D’s face on the card as D’s tourist employee qualification certificate, and around that time, he/she then sent it to the Defendant by using the international mail around September 17, 2015.

As a result, the Defendant forged one Chapter of the tourism employee qualification certificate issued by the President of the Korea Tourism Corporation without authority for the purpose of exercising his/her name in collusion with strawers in order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol of seizure and a list of seizure;

1. Documents submitted to an immigration office, such as the original register of reports on residence in the Republic of Korea of a foreign nationality Korean, and the criminal suspect Kakao dialogue;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (examination of whether public documents are submitted);

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act, Articles 225 and 30 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Confiscation Article 48(1)1 and 2 of the Criminal Code