A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On September 30, 2012, at around 01:15, the Defendant took time from the first floor of the building of the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, the face of the victim D(21 years of age) who reported the side of drinking and elbbow with drinking and arms, without good cause.

In addition, the defendant expressed that he assaulted E, F, G, H, etc. to the victim I (at 20 years of age), "I", "I am", and he am on the part of his son for drinking.

As a result, the Defendant inflicted injury on the victim D, which requires approximately three weeks of medical treatment, and the victim I placed a hole on the victim I on the part of the unclaimed cocoin in the days of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's statement on the fourth trial date in court;

1. Each statement of D and I;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to victim DNA pictures and written diagnosis of injury;

1. Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, the choice of imprisonment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (limited to the case where the defendant has been punished several times by the same method of crime, and the nature of the crime is not good, so severe punishment is required. However, as examined below, most of the assault victims and the injured victims agree with some of them, and some of them have deposited the amount of compensation for damage, etc.);

1. The dismissal of prosecution under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. On September 30, 2012, at around 01:15, the Defendant: (a) on the first floor of the building in Namdong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, the victim E (20 years of age) came to be bad; (b) on the ground that the victim E (20 years of age) came to be bad, the Defendant was able to take the floor of his hand on the hand, on the ground that the victim F (20 years of age) was cut out from that next, and the victim F (20 years of age) was cut off, and the Defendant was able to stop the victim F (or G, who was 20 years of age) who was able to resist and stop from the victim F.

The defendant continued to live in a breath of the victim F, string him into a public toilet, and her with his hand and her face with his hand.