logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산고등법원(창원) 2020.11.19 2020나11776
보험에관한 소송
Text

1. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance against the defendant shall be revoked.

2. The plaintiff's claim as to the above cancellation part is dismissed.

Reasons

1. It seems that the premium was increased by 990 won as the previous insurance contract was renewed after October 19, 2012, from October 19, 2019 to October 30, 2076, after the lapse of 630,000 of the subscription period of the basic fact-based security-based security-based security-based security-based security-based security-based security-based security-based security-based security-based security-based security-based security-based security-based security-based security-based security-based security-based security-based security-based security-based security-based security-based security-based security-based security-based security-based security-based security-based security-based security-based security-based security-based security-based security-based security-based security-based security-based security-based average

(See Eul evidence 1). A renewed type of brain cerebrovascular diagnosis cost of 100 years old, three years old, 19 October 19, 2012 to 30,000,000 on October 19, 2076

A. On October 19, 2012, the Plaintiff entered into a C contract under which the insured person is the Plaintiff (hereinafter “existing Insurance Contract”) with the Defendant, and the following special terms and conditions of the existing Insurance Contract concerning the examination expenses for acute high-ranking symptoms (hereinafter “existing special terms and conditions”). The security contents related to the instant case are as follows:

B. On September 13, 2017, the Plaintiff entered into a separate agreement with the Defendant to guarantee the following matters (hereinafter “instant insurance contract”). During the instant insurance contract, the details of the following special terms and conditions concerning the examination expenses for acute emulious eculation (hereinafter “instant acute eculation special agreement”). During the process of concluding the agreement, H, the Defendant’s employee as the counselor of the Defendant Daegu Center, as the Defendant’s employee, went beyond the insurance coverage of the instant insurance contract, with the Plaintiff’s consent, deleted the part regarding the examination expenses for acute eculation and the collateral for the examination expenses for brain eculation among the matters covered by the existing insurance contract.

The details of separate security payment/insurance coverage (won) shall be 1,00,000 extended from September 13, 2017 to September 13, 2076, 100,000,000 to September 13, 2076, 100,000 diagnosis expenses for diagnosis of eculatory eculation during the 15-year renewal period from September 13, 2017 to September 30, 207, 30,000, 120, 120, 15-year renewal of diagnosis expenses from September 13, 2017 to September 30, 200, 2007, 2007;

C. The Plaintiff on November 12, 2017.

arrow