logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.01.12 2013구합10763
하천편입토지보상금
Text

1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. In the Land Survey Book drawn up during the Japanese Occupation Period, it is written that O, which had an address in the Seo-Seng Seo-gun N in 1913, had an assessment of KRW 1,575 (hereinafter “instant assessment land”) prior to the Gyeonggi Yang-gun P.

B. On December 29, 1980, the assessment land of this case was divided into 4,178 square meters prior to Qua (hereinafter “instant land before the instant partition”) and R road after the land category was changed to a river on March 30, 1984, and the land before the instant partition was divided into 1,939 square meters prior to the instant partition into a river on March 30, 1984 (hereinafter “the instant land 1”); 394 square meters prior to the instant land (hereinafter “the instant land 2”); 1,84 square meters prior to the instant land; hereinafter “the land classification was changed to “road 3”; hereinafter “the instant land”; and each of the instant land was divided into 1,85 square meters prior to the instant division into U. 13, 195, U. 295.

C. On June 29, 1965, the registration of ownership preservation was completed under the name of W on March 27, 1981, and the registration of ownership transfer was completed on March 27, 1981 on the land prior to the instant subdivision. On March 30, 1984, the land before the instant subdivision was changed to a river, and the entry of the owner was deleted. The registration of ownership preservation was made under the name of the Republic of Korea on June 14, 1984 with respect to each of the instant land, and the registration of ownership transfer was completed on September 30, 2004 with respect to each of the instant land.

On the other hand, the plaintiffs' fleetO, who had a permanent domicile in Jongno-gu Seoul Jongno-gu X, died on April 2, 1934, and accordingly, the plaintiffs inherited their property in succession through Y, Z and AA.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 2, 2, 3-1 to 3, 4, 5-1 to 4, 7-1 to 3, 8-1 to 13, 9, and 7-2, respectively.

arrow