Text
1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiff corresponding to the following additional payment order shall be revoked.
Reasons
1. The court's explanation on this part of the occurrence of liability for damages is identical to the corresponding part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, the court's application of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act is cited.
2. The amount of damages not exceeding the scope of compensation for damages shall be calculated at present according to the method of calculating off-line numbers, which deducts intermediate interest at the rate of 5/12 per month as simple interest.
(See attached Form). (A)
On the 22th day of each month from the date of the accident, taking into account the Plaintiff’s age, degree of injury, hospitalization and outpatient treatment period, progress of treatment, etc., the rate of 100% for the month from the date of the accident: 4,801,836 won [In light of the results of each tax information inquiry about the former head of the first instance court’s former head office, it is difficult to recognize that the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff alone incurred a loss of lost income exceeding the daily wage for urban areas due to the above accident.]
(b) 600,000 won (60,000 won) each at the time of an accident regarding the re-production cost of the re-production cost of the re-production of the re-production cost of the re-production cost of the re-production of the re-production cost of the re-production cost of the re-production cost of the re-production cost of the re-production cost of the re-production cost of the re-production cost of the re-production cost of the re-production cost of the instant plant of KRW 900,000 after ten years from the date of the instant accident x 3 =
(c) Limitation of liability (the amount of KRW 4,801,836 medical expenses of KRW 4,500,000 for lost earnings) ¡¿ 80 per cent of the ratio of liability = 7,441,469 (the amount of KRW 4,801,836 medical expenses).
D. Of the Plaintiff’s medical expenses of KRW 5,739,220, the amount equivalent to the Plaintiff’s fault ratio of KRW 1,147,844 (=5,739,220 x 20%) property damage of KRW 7,441,469 - KRW 1,147,844 = 6,293,625
E. The consolation money amounting to 5,300,000 won (the plaintiff's age, property, and educational degree, occupation, background of accident, degree and degree of injury, progress of treatment, progress of treatment, the victim's negligence, and all other circumstances shown in the oral argument) / (the ground for recognition) is without dispute. Each entry in Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 5, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 2, the statement and image of evidence Nos. 1 and 2, and the first instance court G.