logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2014.10.10 2014나2009104
손해배상
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against A, which orders additional payment, shall be revoked.

Reasons

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: ① 5th 8th Do's "do" is as follows; ② 5th 8th Do's "Do" is as "or," 5th 13th Do's "ice fence" is as "defense fence," 5th 21 and 7th 18 lines are as "Collision"; ② 8th 19 lines "20%" are as "30%"; ② 3th Do's damages liability is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance except for the following parts. Thus, this is cited as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

3. The basis for calculation, expenses, calculation and amount of the plaintiffs' property, mental injury caused by the instant accident shall be as follows: Provided, That less than the monthly average for the convenience of calculation shall be included in the side on which the appraised amount is less than the last month and less than the original amount shall be discarded; however, the current price at the time of the instant accident shall be calculated by applying the simple discount method which deducts intermediary interest at the rate of 5/12 per month: (a) the age of 1) gender and 4.0 years from the date of the instant accident: 43.728 [1.6% from the date of the instant accident, 2.6% from the date of the date of the instant accident, 3.6% from the date of the instant accident, 4.6% from the date of the instant accident, 2.6% from the date of the date of the instant accident, 14.6% from the date of entrance to the date of the instant accident, 2.6% from the date of the date of the instant accident, and 14.6% from the date of the instant accident (2.6% from the date of the date of the Plaintiff Association).

arrow