Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10,000,000 (one million).

When the defendant does not pay a fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

[2] On June 29, 2009, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 500,000,000 as a penalty for fraud from the Seoul Central District Court on July 24, 2009, a summary order of KRW 200,000,000 as a penalty for fraud from the Seoul East District Court on November 23, 2009, respectively. On December 24, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to a summary order of KRW 50,000,000 as a penalty for fraud from the Daejeon District Court on December 24, 201 and was sentenced to a suspended sentence of KRW 1,00,000 as a penalty for fraud from the Daejeon District Court on December 28, 201 to be sentenced to a summary order of KRW 6,00,000,000 as a penalty for fraud.

[Criminal facts] On November 23, 2015, the Defendant sent a letter to the victim C that he/she would have access to the river chip of the Gangseo-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, to the four countries of the Republic of Korea and want to purchase the “dol Game chip” on the bulletin board of the place.

“The phrase “ was false.”

However, the defendant did not have a game chip that is not a content and did not have an intent or ability to display a game chip upon receiving money from the injured party.

The Defendant received 27,000 won from the injured party for the purchase price of game chips, not in the same day, from the third party, to the National Bank account (Account Number D) in the name of the Defendant. From that point to January 13, 2016, the Defendant acquired 1,732,000 won in total on 26 occasions, as shown in the List of Crimes in the attached Table.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of each victims;

1. Confirmation of the details of each transaction, the details of each conversation, a certificate of transfer confirmation, a detailed statement of each transaction, and a certificate of entry and withdrawal;

1. Each image of books and game CDs;

1. Habituality: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes recognizing habituality in light of the fact that inquiry, such as criminal history, criminal records shown in each summary order and judgment, and criminal records in the past have continued to be committed in a form similar to this case;

1. Article 351 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime