All of the prosecutions of this case are dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged shall not infringe on the copyright of a program copyright holder in the course of business by acquiring the reproduction of a program created by infringing another person’s program copyright without any legitimate authority in the course of business with the knowledge of such fact;

A. From the day it was impossible to know the date as the representative director of the corporation B, the Defendant infringed the copyright of the copyright holder of the program equivalent to KRW 322,000,000 at the market price by illegally reproducing the program copyright of KRW 16.14 (market price of KRW 184,00,000), Telka Strucure 20.02 (market price of KRW 92,00,000), Telka Struct 21.01 (market price of KRW 46,00,000) in the office B of Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government building A, Geumcheon-gu, Seoul, as well as the office B, Inc. 901.

B. Defendant B, at the time and place indicated in the above paragraph (a), Defendant B, the representative director of the Defendant, committed an act of violation of the Copyright Act using a reproduced program by infringing copyright as above in the course of business.

2. Each of the above facts charged is an offense falling under Article 136(2)4 and Article 124(1)3 of the Copyright Act, and cannot be punished against the express intent of the victim pursuant to Article 140 subparag. 1 of the same Act.

According to the records, the victim's withdrawal of complaint and written agreement that the defendant does not want punishment on May 10, 2018, which was after the prosecution of this case, was submitted to this court. Thus, all of the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 (6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.