logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2018.07.04 2016가합48207
채무부존재확인
Text

1. The Plaintiff’s medical treatment against the Defendant during the period from October 15, 2014 to December 11, 2015 to the Defendant.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is a dentist who operates a dental clinic (hereinafter “Plaintiff’s clinic”) in Busan Seo-gu, and the Defendant was treated by the Plaintiff’s clinic from October 15, 2014 to December 11, 2015.

B. The Defendant’s medical treatment procedure 1) On October 15, 2014, the Defendant was admitted to the Plaintiff’s Council member, and see, e.g., the 2 Daegu on the right-hand side of the music (see, e.g., dental license No. 17, and dental structure; hereinafter the same

At the time, the Plaintiff complained of inconvenience. At the same time, he/she was fested to the foregoing pathal, and the 1stal value of the Haak-gu (No. 46) was lost, and the 2ndal value of the Haak-gu (No. 47) moved to the right side of the Haak-gu (No. 17 and No. 47). Accordingly, the Plaintiff adjusted selective interference with the removal of the pathal from October 22, 2014 to November 21, 2014. After that, the Plaintiff adjusted selective interference with the 1stal value of the Haak-gu (No. 46) over six occasions each time the Defendant complained of inconvenience. From November 28, 2014 to April 1, 2015.

3) On October 7, 2015, the Defendant, who was admitted to the Plaintiff’s clinic, recommended the E dental hospital to provide ice treatment, and the Plaintiff made a request for medical treatment on the same day to the Defendant, such as the production of ice, and the adjustment of ices throughout several times from October 19, 2015 to December 11, 2015 (hereinafter “the instant treatment,” including the Plaintiff’s clinic’s treatment, was referred to as “the instant treatment”

(C) The Defendant currently complained of symptoms, such as “the previous location was changed, and the total of the foregoing is not consistent with the foregoing, and the overall pains of the baby have deepened.” [Grounds for recognition] The Defendant has no dispute, and Party A’s evidence 1 through 5 (the number of pages is included; hereinafter the same shall apply).

Each entry of this Court, the result of the commission of appraisal of medical records to the head of the F Association of this Court, and the purport of the whole pleadings.

arrow