logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2017.04.14 2017고단434
공무집행방해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On January 22, 2017, around 00:20, the Defendant assaulted E who is a cohabitant at the 00:20 of the Government-si, Da 32, and received E’s 112 report and demanded confirmation of personal information from the head of the Gu-gu Police Station F of the Gu government Police Station who called out after receiving the E’s 112 report, and without any justifiable reason, “Choe, Ma, Ra, and meated.”

“In doing a bath, the lower court did not inform the police officer G of his personal information by having the chest two times in his hand.”

Accordingly, when the police officer G saw the defendant to be arrested as an offender in the act of assault, the police officer's cream cream cream cream cream cream cream cream cream cream cream cream cream cream cream cream cream cream cream cream cream cream cream cream cream cream cream

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the police officer's 112 reporting process and the legitimate execution of official duties concerning the arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the statutes on police statements made to G and H

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. The reason for sentencing choice of sentence of imprisonment with prison labor [the scope of the recommended sentence] Where there are many public officials suffering from damage (one year to four years) in the aggravated area (one year to four years), the aggravated area (one year to four years), [the person subject to special aggravation]] [the decision of sentence] in this case, and the defendant's power, sentence of sentence is inevitable in light of the contents of this case and the defendant's power.

However, in consideration of the fact that the defendant deposited 500,000 won for the victims, the punishment shall be determined as ordered within the scope of the recommended punishment.

arrow