logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2017.12.15 2017고단3861
재물손괴등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant: (a) around 03:40 on June 21, 2017, in the situation where there is a light-line E (hereinafter referred to as “E light-line E (hereinafter referred to as the “E light-line”), etc. belonging to the Busan Police Station D District E (hereinafter referred to as the “K”) of the Busan Police Station D (hereinafter referred to as the “E light-line”), he/she sent back to F and G, “this spacks, cut off, and Rabk, the Rabk.”

“I am for the police,” etc., and as I am for the use of arms by E cambling, I am for the Head of E cambling.

Chewing Shear, “Amba Hamba Hamba,” and “Ambba walk to this Chewing Ghana

In the case of Skira, good horses, “.......” and, in this case, can be punished for interference with the performance of official duties from the E Superintendent General.

In spite of the receipt of a warning, he did his behavior that seems to cause harm by disregarding and continuing the F and G, and was re-infilled from the E border, he threatened the E border with his hand as he would see, and pushed the chest part of the E border on 2 to 3 occasions by hand.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the prevention and investigation of crimes by the police officer's 112 report.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each statement made to I, J, E Senior, and K;

1. Application of the investigation report (overtime 8, 16, 28), photographs/cinematographic outputs-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act regarding criminal facts [the scope of recommendations] The basic area (6 months to 1 year and 6 months) of the first type of interference with the performance of official duties (the decision of sentence] (the same kind of interference with the performance of official duties) is reasonable even if the defendant was not a criminal offense of interference with the performance of official duties. In particular, the defendant was sentenced on April 7, 2017 to the violation of the Punishment of Violence, etc. Act (joint injury) in the Changwon District Court's branch branch branch of Changwon District Court, the defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for 6 months, one year of suspension of execution, and 40 hours of community service, so that the defendant was sentenced to the order and the compliance with the community service order after being sentenced to the order, and the police officer was not aware of the fact that it did not go through three months.

arrow