beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On January 4, 2013, the Defendant got married between the victim B (n, 43 years of age) and the victim B (n, 43 years of age).
1. Crimes of each assault;
A. On June 24, 2016, the Defendant assaulted the victim on June 24, 2016 at D main points located in Gangnam-si C around 22:50 on June 24, 2016, on the ground that the victim was drinking together with the former wife B, on the ground that the victim was drinking together with another male, and on the ground that the victim was drinking together with another male, on the part of the victim, the victim was her aground, was her aground, and the victim’s face was her aground, and the victim was her face was her aground, and the victim was her head was taken off from the back of the her seat, the victim’s face, and the head was her hand and drinking.
B. On June 27, 2016, the Defendant: (a) sought money from the victim’s workplace F, 09:00 on June 27, 2016, 2016; (b) sought money from the victim, i.e., “humping, or giving money; (c) but the victim did not comply with the demand; (d) stated that “huming, humping, and humping,” the victim’s chest was tightly pushed the victim’s chest, and the victim was faced with the display stand, such as the victim.
2. On June 9, 2016, the Defendant committed a violation of the Act on Promotion of the Use of Information and Communications Network and Information Protection, Etc. (Defamation) did not have a sexual intercourse with a male with the victim’s sexual intercourse with the aim of slandering the victim B in the vicinity of Gangseo-si, and did not have any record of or taken pictures of sex-related images, etc. at all, the Defendant’s mobile phone (G) on the “Cine Kakakao Kakao Stockholm,” which is a mobile phone display case using the Defendant’s mobile phone (hereinafter “Kakao Kao Kao mp case, which is open to the public to be seen by any person adjacent to the conversation name of the victim”). At that time, the Defendant publicly posted a false statement that “I want to listen to the recording of the content of O (victim’s name).”